Categories: Payment system news

Bitstamp Reverts Plans for Inactivity Fee After Receiving Massive User Backlash

Luxembourg-based crypto exchange Bitstamp has revealed that it will no longer move forward with its plans to charge inactive customers about 5% of their account balance.

Bitstamp Announces Inactivity Fee

The exchange announced last week its plans to charge inactive customers outside the United States a monthly fee of 10 euros ($10.18) starting August 1. According to the statement, the policy would apply to users with less than 200 euros ($203.62) in their account who have not deposited, withdrawn, traded, or staked crypto assets on the exchange for the past 12 months.

To avoid being charged, the company advised inactive customers to trade, deposit, withdraw, or stake a minimum of 25 euros ($25.44) before next month. The exchange cited the administrative cost of keeping inactive accounts as the reason for the decision.

However, the announcement received a massive backlash from Bitstamp’s customers, with some users suggesting that the update was a strategic move for the company to survive the current bear market while ripping off customers.

This is so disappointing BitStamp

-It’s actually pathetic.

You’re charging the lowest holders approx 5% of their account balance so they are “forced” to trade or stake with you!!??

How is this even legal
https://t.co/DeBicjMIF3

— Crypto Bitlord (@crypto_bitlord7) July 3, 2022

Bitstamp Makes U-turn

After noticing users’ outrage, Bitstamp published another update, saying it will no longer charge the planned inactivity fee.

“Last week, we sent out communication that, starting August 1, we would introduce a fee for some of our inactive customers. The fee would have been charged to inactive customers with account balances of less than €200. After listening to our community’s response, we’ve changed course. There will be no inactivity fee,” the exchange said in a company blog.

Although Bitstamp removed the initial announcement and apologized for any inconvenience it may have caused, some aggrieved users said they had already deleted their accounts from the exchange.

too late, I’ve deleted my account already. Luckily for us users, there’s plenty of competition in crypto space. Whoever came up with this idea in first place caused big damage to the brand

— 0xRadim (@0xRadim) July 7, 2022

superadmin

Recent Posts

Market Analyst Predicts Ripple’s XRP Next Move Could Send Price Soaring to $15

XRP traded largely flat on Monday following a volatile week marked by a broader cryptocurrency…

8 hours ago

Strategy Says Its Bitcoin Stash Could Keep Dividends Flowing For 31 Years

Strategy is back in the spotlight after revealing its Bitcoin treasury could support shareholder dividends…

8 hours ago

The fall of BitMEX and BitMart: Could Exchange Collapses Bring Crypto Market Rebound? CZ Reacts

Recent business collapses of exchanges have brought speculation about whether such crashes could trigger the…

8 hours ago

Is Ethereum Readying for Bullish Takeoff? Mysterious Whale Spends $50.04M DAI to Buy 25,425 ETH

Whale clients are showing renewed appetite for Ether, a development that could benefit crypto customers…

8 hours ago

EMCD Commits Up to $30M to Miners Facing the Industry’s Toughest Profitability Squeeze

EMCD, a global crypto-fintech platform and one of the world’s largest Bitcoin mining pools, has…

17 hours ago

Trump Token Team Moves $16M TRUMP Coin to Fireblock Custody; Will TRUMP Breakout from Downtrend?

TRUMP Coin is attracting crypto traders’ attention following the Trump token team's move to transfer…

1 day ago