The lawsuit between the US Securities and Exchange Commission has been at the forefront of the cryptocurrency industry ever since it started back in 2020.
However, lately, the attention toward it has been exacerbated because of the most recent developments. Recall that in July, the presiding judge – Analisa Torres – ruled that secondary sales of XRP didn’t constitute investment contracts. This was a blow to the SEC as it refuted one of its main arguments.
But did the SEC commit another glaring mistake in the events that followed?
“Normally, a party appealing a final ruling has the chance to interpret the ruling in a way that is helpful to it, and the court that issued the ruling doesn’t get a chance to explain or clarify. But now, whether Judge Torres certifies the interlocutory appeal or refuses to, she will have the chance to clarify her ruling. She will make it very clear that her decision was only that the SEC utterly failed to meet its burden of proof.
One important thing non-lawyers might know but not always remember or appreciate is the general rule that no new evidence can be made on appeal, and no new legal arguments can be made on appeal either. The SEC is stuck with the record.” – Greg Beuke said.
The post Did the SEC Commit a Huge Mistake in the Case Against Ripple (XRP)? appeared first on CryptoPotato.
XRP traded largely flat on Monday following a volatile week marked by a broader cryptocurrency…
Strategy is back in the spotlight after revealing its Bitcoin treasury could support shareholder dividends…
Recent business collapses of exchanges have brought speculation about whether such crashes could trigger the…
Whale clients are showing renewed appetite for Ether, a development that could benefit crypto customers…
EMCD, a global crypto-fintech platform and one of the world’s largest Bitcoin mining pools, has…
TRUMP Coin is attracting crypto traders’ attention following the Trump token team's move to transfer…