In an Aug. 14 post on X, David Schwartz stated that the determination in the XRP case was based on whether a court is “confined to look at the formal terms of a single contract to determine if it is an investment.”
The issue in Howey was whether the court was confined to looking at the formal terms of a single contract to determine if it was an investment contract. The holding is that you can’t *just* look at the contract, not that there doesn’t have to be a contract.
The post Ripple (XRP) CTO David Schwartz Breaks Down Howey Test Following SEC Appeal appeared first on CryptoPotato.
XRP traded largely flat on Monday following a volatile week marked by a broader cryptocurrency…
Strategy is back in the spotlight after revealing its Bitcoin treasury could support shareholder dividends…
Recent business collapses of exchanges have brought speculation about whether such crashes could trigger the…
Whale clients are showing renewed appetite for Ether, a development that could benefit crypto customers…
EMCD, a global crypto-fintech platform and one of the world’s largest Bitcoin mining pools, has…
TRUMP Coin is attracting crypto traders’ attention following the Trump token team's move to transfer…